The Truth or lack thereof in current science

Science today is so important for new discoveries but I have become pretty jaded with any information coming from so called mainstream science because the people doing the work are tailoring their work to fit into niches that their grantors wont have issue with.

In other words instead of comming out and saying that they see structure (what I see) or even natural formations (still screams life of some kind, coral is alive) in Wills newest video they go totally out in left field and talk about things like the possibility of clouds forming 2 million years ago. It's usless and boring when we have hundreds of pictures right in front of us and the only people saying anything are the people without the big government grants. To me that is a profound bastardization of the whole curiosity mission.

People (paid scientists) too scared to say whats really on their minds for fear of losing their grant money and not being able to continue their work, but what they fail to realize is that by folding to the pressure of possible backlash from speaking their minds they have lost their credibility. They instead keep the funding and go for the safe science and jump on the bandwagon with all the other pc science cowards and do some obscure low cost project pocjet the funds and bash anyone with a fresh oerspective. Or worse yet ridicule them into obscurity.

I'd love to know how many great ideas we've lost due to pressure from the boot licking science cronies who are afraid of losing status, funding or both and rather subvert their own work to match the mainstream nothingness that is science today.

Sirry I had a few run on sentences but im in the hosoital getting 3mg of dilaudid every 2 hours for pain and I really don't feel like fixing it. LOL